Ryan2099's profile

Contributor

 • 

13 Messages

Thursday, August 13th, 2020 7:00 PM

Closed

Rogue DHCP Server - Colorado Springs, 80916 and Surrounding Area

Rogue DHCP Server - Colorado Springs, 80916 and Surrounding Area

 

Ehancing the network in the area is causing huge issue as many of us are getting a 

 

24.128.XXX.XXX IP address. This is a Wallingford, Connecticut area IP address and is causing random disconnects. I was looking for a 75. or 70.162 or 70.163

 

Please look into this asap!

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies and is no longer visible to community members.

Contributor

 • 

13 Messages

4 years ago

thank you for looking at this.

Gold Problem Solver

 • 

7.9K Messages

4 years ago

I wonder if Comcast could be implementing CGNAT?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier-grade_NAT

 

Also, I assume the user is NOT putting a router behind a gateway and getting Double-NAT?

Expert

 • 

108.4K Messages

4 years ago

I doubt it. To what avail ? Why do that when their gateway devices are already doing NAT ? That is mainly employed by telecoms.

Contributor

 • 

13 Messages

4 years ago

It does appear they may have introduced a Carrier grade NAT. The latency between the 10.61 to an IP4 translation keeps dropping. After a period of time I stop getting an IPV4 address and websites time out and my connection stalls while it tries to reconnect. It does this over and over through the day. Then it says my only connection is a IPV6 address becaue it cannot resolve an IPV4. That is unless I force my computer off IPV6. Then it resolves to a crazy IP address somewhere else in the country per the GEO Location that was last given by that IP.

Expert

 • 

108.4K Messages

4 years ago

Why would they need that? It was intended to address the potential shortage of IPv4 addresses. Now, with the implementation of an overabundance of IPv6 addresses, NAT is now basically obsolete.

 

Also, the middleboxes that would make it function would not need IP addresses (be IP addressable ) that would show up with ping / tracert probes. They would be invisible on the network just like the many many other middleboxes / devices that the general public doesn't know they even exist.

 

Something else is going on but I can't tell you what it may be, sorry.

Contributor

 • 

13 Messages

4 years ago

I have truly gotten nowhere.

I have called over 65+ people in now 7 days.

I had 2 techs with another one coming again.

The tap is great pushing 1297 unfiltered packet size.

I am just as preplexed as you.

I think the TFTP could be wiped.

The area I did find out had a fiber cut as well. I am getting more and more pieces everytime I call in.

forum icon

New to the Community?

Start Here