J

Visitor

 • 

6 Messages

Tuesday, June 6th, 2023 3:06 AM

Closed

No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out every 2 hours

Hi,

I see the T3 time-out every 2 hours, which causes a loss of connection. Once the restart has completed and I am reconnected, the connection is stable for another 2 hours. I see the following message in the event log after the modem comes back up:

No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=[REDACTED];CMTS-MAC=[REDACTED];CM-QOS=1.0;CM-VER=3.0;

I've engaged 3 different support agents via chat:

The first support agent escalated to Tier 2 support, but I was never contacted by them.

The second support agent "changed the modem bootfile and connected me with a more stable server", and while whatever they did mostly smoothed out the latency spikes I have been seeing in PingPlotter, this did not solve the disconnects.

The third support agent suggested to contact the modem manufacturer.

The modem is cabled directly from the wall, no additional splitters. I have made no changes to networking devices or configuration, this just started happening out of the blue from what I can tell (about 6 days ago).

Connection details:

Modem/router is C7000-100NAS

Startup Procedure
Procedure Status Comment
Acquire Downstream Channel 609000000 Hz Locked
Connectivity State OK Operational
Boot State OK Operational
Security Enabled BPI+
IP Provisioning Mode Honor MDD honorMdd(4)
 
Downstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status Modulation Channel ID Frequency Power SNR Correctables Uncorrectables
1 Locked QAM256 36 609000000 Hz 1.9 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
2 Locked QAM256 24 531000000 Hz 2.4 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
3 Locked QAM256 25 543000000 Hz 1.6 dBmV 38.7 dB 0 0
4 Locked QAM256 26 549000000 Hz 1.9 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
5 Locked QAM256 27 555000000 Hz 1.8 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
6 Locked QAM256 28 561000000 Hz 1.7 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
7 Locked QAM256 29 567000000 Hz 1.6 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
8 Locked QAM256 30 573000000 Hz 1.3 dBmV 38.8 dB 0 0
9 Locked QAM256 31 579000000 Hz 2.1 dBmV 39 dB 0 0
10 Locked QAM256 32 585000000 Hz 2.6 dBmV 39.1 dB 0 0
11 Locked QAM256 33 591000000 Hz 1.4 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
12 Locked QAM256 34 597000000 Hz 2.3 dBmV 39.1 dB 0 0
13 Locked QAM256 35 603000000 Hz 2.6 dBmV 39 dB 0 0
14 Locked QAM256 37 615000000 Hz 2.1 dBmV 39 dB 0 0
15 Locked QAM256 38 621000000 Hz 1.9 dBmV 39 dB 0 0
16 Locked QAM256 39 627000000 Hz 1.9 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
17 Locked QAM256 40 633000000 Hz 2.1 dBmV 39.8 dB 0 0
18 Locked QAM256 41 639000000 Hz 1.5 dBmV 39.5 dB 0 0
19 Locked QAM256 42 645000000 Hz 0.9 dBmV 39.4 dB 0 0
20 Locked QAM256 43 651000000 Hz 1.4 dBmV 39.4 dB 0 0
21 Locked QAM256 44 657000000 Hz 0.3 dBmV 39.3 dB 0 0
22 Locked QAM256 45 663000000 Hz -0.6 dBmV 39 dB 0 0
23 Locked QAM256 46 669000000 Hz -0.2 dBmV 38.6 dB 0 0
24 Locked QAM256 47 675000000 Hz -0.8 dBmV 38.5 dB 0 0
 
Upstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status US Channel Type Channel ID Symbol Rate Frequency Power
1 Locked ATDMA 3 5120 Ksym/sec 22800000 Hz 53 dBmV
2 Locked ATDMA 1 2560 Ksym/sec 10400000 Hz 54 dBmV
3 Locked ATDMA 2 5120 Ksym/sec 16400000 Hz 53.3 dBmV
4 Locked ATDMA 4 5120 Ksym/sec 29200000 Hz 52.3 dBmV
5 Locked ATDMA 5 5120 Ksym/sec 35600000 Hz 52.3 dBmV
6 Locked ATDMA 6 2560 Ksym/sec 40400000 Hz 52.3 dBmV
7 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Ksym/sec 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV
8 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Ksym/sec 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV

On some occasions I have seen counts in the hundreds for both correctables and uncorrectables for most of the bonded downstream channels. Just not at the time I am posting this.

Could it be an issue with the modem? Or should I schedule a tech visit? I'm at a loss for what direction to go next. Disconnects every 2 hours is extremely frustrating and disruptive.

Gold Problem Solver

 • 

26.3K Messages

2 years ago

... T3 time-out every 2 hours ...

All of the upstream power levels posted are out of spec (too high), suggesting that there is most likely a poor connection between your modem and Comcast's network. Problems like this are often due to corroded coax connectors or damaged coax cable, usually in or near your home. Running the cable through a surge protector, a defective splitter, or too many splitters can cause signal problems as well. If there is an amplifier in the line make sure it's getting power. 

If you want to troubleshoot this yourself, please see Internet Troubleshooting Tips.

If you can't find the problem or you'd rather have Comcast take care of it and an employee does not respond to your message here, call them at the phone number on your bill or 1-800-Comcast, or use one of the options on https://www.xfinity.com/support/contact-us/. It's not likely they can fix the problem remotely. If not, insist they send a tech out to identify the cause and correct it.

If the tech finds bad coax, splitters, amplifiers, or connections in your home (even if Comcast originally supplied them) you'll probably have to pay for the visit ($70-$100) unless you have their Service Protection Plan ( https://www.xfinity.com/support/articles/service-protection-plan, closed to customers that don't already have it). If the trouble is due to a faulty Comcast rental device or anything outside your home you shouldn't be charged.

Please be aware that there are 2 kinds of responses in this Forum: Replies and Comments. When you Comment on a post by scrolling down to "Comment on this post here...", I am notified of your response. But if you select Reply, I am NOT notified and may not be aware of your response.

Visitor

 • 

6 Messages

2 years ago

Hey Bruce, thanks for your helpful reply.

I did find a splitter that I forgot I put in. I have removed it and so now definitely the coax is direct from the wall to the modem. This seems to have improved the upstream power levels a bit, but I'm not exactly sure what the optimal values should be.

Upstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status US Channel Type Channel ID Symbol Rate Frequency Power
1 Locked ATDMA 5 5120 Ksym/sec 35600000 Hz 48.5 dBmV
2 Locked ATDMA 1 2560 Ksym/sec 10400000 Hz 50.3 dBmV
3 Locked ATDMA 2 5120 Ksym/sec 16400000 Hz 49.3 dBmV
4 Locked ATDMA 3 5120 Ksym/sec 22800000 Hz 49 dBmV
5 Locked ATDMA 4 5120 Ksym/sec 29200000 Hz 48.8 dBmV
6 Locked ATDMA 6 2560 Ksym/sec 40400000 Hz 48.3 dBmV
7 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Ksym/sec 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV
8 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Ksym/sec 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV

However even with this change, still I see the same behavior - disconnect after 2 hours:

Time Priority Description
2023-6-6, 11:56:01 Critical (3) Started Unicast Maintenance Ranging - No Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=[REDACTED];CMTS-MAC=[REDACTED];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2023-6-6, 11:56:01 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=[REDACTED];CMTS-MAC=[REDACTED];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

Gold Problem Solver

 • 

26.3K Messages

2 years ago

... This seems to have improved the upstream power levels a bit ...

They're better, but now borderline. It's best to have them in the middle of the Internet Troubleshooting Tips range, which would be +40 to +45 dBmV. Also what do the downstream channels look like now? They should be 3 or 4 dB higher than they were with perhaps slightly better (higher) SNR, but it's always best to check after making any changes to the coax line.

Please be aware that there are 2 kinds of responses in this Forum: Replies and Comments. When you Comment on a post by scrolling down to "Comment on this post here...", I am notified of your response. But if you select Reply, I am NOT notified and may not be aware of your response.

Visitor

 • 

6 Messages

2 years ago

You are pretty much spot on - downstream power increased, SNR looks to have stayed mostly the same.

Downstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status Modulation Channel ID Frequency Power SNR Correctables Uncorrectables
1 Locked QAM256 36 609000000 Hz 4 dBmV 38.8 dB 0 0
2 Locked QAM256 24 531000000 Hz 4.9 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
3 Locked QAM256 25 543000000 Hz 5.2 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
4 Locked QAM256 26 549000000 Hz 5.3 dBmV 39 dB 0 0
5 Locked QAM256 27 555000000 Hz 4.9 dBmV 39 dB 0 0
6 Locked QAM256 28 561000000 Hz 4.7 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
7 Locked QAM256 29 567000000 Hz 4.9 dBmV 39 dB 0 0
8 Locked QAM256 30 573000000 Hz 4.5 dBmV 39 dB 0 0
9 Locked QAM256 31 579000000 Hz 5 dBmV 39 dB 0 0
10 Locked QAM256 32 585000000 Hz 4.8 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
11 Locked QAM256 33 591000000 Hz 4 dBmV 38.8 dB 0 0
12 Locked QAM256 34 597000000 Hz 4.6 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
13 Locked QAM256 35 603000000 Hz 4.4 dBmV 38.7 dB 0 0
14 Locked QAM256 37 615000000 Hz 4.2 dBmV 38.9 dB 0 0
15 Locked QAM256 38 621000000 Hz 3.9 dBmV 38.8 dB 0 0
16 Locked QAM256 39 627000000 Hz 3.7 dBmV 38.8 dB 0 0
17 Locked QAM256 40 633000000 Hz 3.9 dBmV 39.4 dB 0 0
18 Locked QAM256 41 639000000 Hz 3.5 dBmV 39.3 dB 0 0
19 Locked QAM256 42 645000000 Hz 3.4 dBmV 39.1 dB 0 0
20 Locked QAM256 43 651000000 Hz 3.3 dBmV 39 dB 0 0
21 Locked QAM256 44 657000000 Hz 3 dBmV 39.2 dB 0 0
22 Locked QAM256 45 663000000 Hz 2.5 dBmV 39 dB 0 0
23 Locked QAM256 46 669000000 Hz 2.7 dBmV 38.6 dB 0 0
24 Locked QAM256 47 675000000 Hz 2.3 dBmV 38.2 dB 0 0
 
Upstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status US Channel Type Channel ID Symbol Rate Frequency Power
1 Locked ATDMA 5 5120 Ksym/sec 35600000 Hz 49.3 dBmV
2 Locked ATDMA 1 2560 Ksym/sec 10400000 Hz 50.8 dBmV
3 Locked ATDMA 2 5120 Ksym/sec 16400000 Hz 49.8 dBmV
4 Locked ATDMA 3 5120 Ksym/sec 22800000 Hz 49.5 dBmV
5 Locked ATDMA 4 5120 Ksym/sec 29200000 Hz 49 dBmV
6 Locked ATDMA 6 2560 Ksym/sec 40400000 Hz 49 dBmV
7 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Ksym/sec 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV
8 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Ksym/sec 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV

(edited)

Visitor

 • 

6 Messages

2 years ago

Still T3 every 2 hours (for some reason the modem clock is 1 hour behind):

Time Priority Description
2023-6-6, 16:03:31 Critical (3) Started Unicast Maintenance Ranging - No Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=[REDACTED];CMTS-MAC=[REDACTED];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2023-6-6, 16:03:31 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=[REDACTED];CMTS-MAC=[REDACTED];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2023-6-6, 14:00:07 Critical (3) Started Unicast Maintenance Ranging - No Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=[REDACTED];CMTS-MAC=[REDACTED];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2023-6-6, 14:00:07 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=[REDACTED];CMTS-MAC=[REDACTED];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2023-6-6, 11:56:01 Critical (3) Started Unicast Maintenance Ranging - No Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=[REDACTED];CMTS-MAC=[REDACTED];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2023-6-6, 11:56:01 Warning (5) MDD message timeout;CM-MAC=[REDACTED];CMTS-MAC=[REDACTED];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

Visitor

 • 

6 Messages

2 years ago

@Xfinity Support   can you please provide guidance for next steps to get this resolved please. 

Problem Solver

 • 

909 Messages

I can definitely further review with you. Based on what we're seeing in the reports here, I would like to take a closer look on our end and see if anything is showing up for the area. 

Please send us a Direct Message with your first and last name. The message icon is located at the top right of the Community Forum page, clicking on the message icon will allow you to initiate a chat conversation with us directly. Please ensure you are sending your message to our 'Xfinity Support' handle.

I no longer work for Comcast.

Expert

 • 

110K Messages

2 years ago

@jmsoz @XfinityStephanieK 

Please circle back here and post any possible solutions for the issue here in these open forums so that all readers here may benefit from the exchange / info. This is in keeping with the spirit for which these public help forums were originally intended. Thank you.

Visitor

 • 

6 Messages

It's taken me too long to get back here and reply, but my situation was completely resolved. The support agent suggested I go in and pick up an XFI Gateway as a step to isolate if it's a line issue or my (old) Nighthawk. Since these devices are basically rental, the cost to me would be less than $10 for a few days to try it out and see.

Well, it fixed the issue. I have had zero disconnects since using the XFI, which means my Nighthawk was the issue. It was also an older DOCSIS so I did see a speed increase as well with the XFI. 

No doubt any new cable modem would also have solved it but this was the easiest solution for me.

Official Employee

 • 

2.3K Messages

@jmsoz, Thank you so much for circling back and sharing those updates with the rest of our forum members, I'm so glad you were able to get to the bottom of your issue. I realize using your own modem is a great way to save money, but we also have top of the line gateways, so I have no doubt you'll enjoy your equipment. The nice thing is that you won't have to worry about updating your tech. Have a great rest of your week and be safe out there! 

I am an Official Xfinity Employee.
Official Employees are from multiple teams within Xfinity: CARE, Product, Leadership.
We ask that you post publicly so people with similar questions may benefit from the conversation.
Was your question answered? Please, mark a reply as the Accepted Answer.tick

Visitor

 • 

4 Messages

2 years ago

Having the same issue since at least fall of 2022. I was running a straight line from the service pole to my modem, no splitters. Had a tech out and they described a known issue with upstream noise somewhere in the area, which crews hadn't been able to locate. They suggested buying a newer modem, with more upstream channels, so it had more options to switch to when one went down. My modem at that time had 4, so I upgraded to one with 8. Turns out, they only use 5 to begin with. They also said my signal was calibrated for the home to have a splitter, and since I didn't, adding one would adjust my signal levels back into ranges where it wouldn't exceed the limits and drop the channels as often when the issue would occur. They installed a splitter with terminator caps on the unused positions, and replaced the lines from the service pole to my home as well. The only other object in line between their service and my modem is a MoCa filter and all cables from the exterior junction box to the modem were installed fresh by the installation tech not quite 4 years ago, with zero damage or manipulation in between.

With the new modem, a Netgear CM1000v2.   I did notice improvement, but still intermittent issues. It's common around lunchtime/early afternoon, but does sometimes happen later in the day as well. The upstream light will start flashing, I lose my connection to my work VPN, causing some hazardous situations for me, professionally. Recently, it has gotten worse, similar to last fall in frequency. 

I had a tech out again last week on an unrelated matter, same one actually, and had them check the noise levels, but being the wrong time of the day, they were not able to observe the issue.  I've since performed a complete overhaul of my entire network, being more on top of monitoring this issue, and what I learned here, I see now that my upstream dB are also on the upper end of the range, between 45.5 and 48.5dB. I expect that when the issue arises, those may be spiking too high, and dropping channels, but I haven't been able to directly observe this on the modem yet. 

I'm seeing all kinds of T3 and T4 errors on the logs, in a 16 hour period today, there were 40 instances of warnings, either:

Warning (5) Dynamic Range Window violation,

or

Warning (5) RNG-RSP CCAP Commanded Power in Excess of 6 dB Below the Value Corresponding to the Top of the DRW;CM-MAC=[redacted];CMTS-MAC=[redacted];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;

and 

Critical (3) Received Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Unicast Maintenance opportunities received - T4 time out;CM-MAC=[redacted];CMTS-MAC=[redacted];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;

Yesterday, when I gathered the logs from the modem, there were about 55 Entries in total, going back just over a month in range, so it seems to be happening more frequently now. Interestingly, there are numerous instances in that collection with "Time Not Established". Again, almost all of those are Critical (3), with much less Warning (5). In that collection, there's more variety, with repetitive cycles of the following type errors, with various orders each time: 

Received Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Unicast Maintenance opportunities received - T4 time out;CM-MAC=[redacted];CMTS-MAC=[redacted];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;

Started Unicast Maintenance Ranging - No Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=[redacted];CMTS-MAC=[redacted];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;

SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing;CM-MAC=[redacted];CMTS-MAC=[redacted but was all zeros];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;

No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=[redacted];CMTS-MAC=[redacted];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;

REG-RSP-MP Mismatch Between Calculated Value for P1.6hi Compared to CCAP Provided Value;CM-MAC=[redacted];CMTS-MAC=[redacted];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;

RNG-RSP CCAP Commanded Power Exceeds Value Corresponding to the Top of the DRW;CM-MAC=[redacted];CMTS-MAC=[redacted];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;

Dynamic Range Window violation

SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Loss of Sync;CM-MAC=[redacted];CMTS-MAC=[redacted];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;

SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing;CM-MAC=[redacted];CMTS-MAC=[redacted but was all zeros];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;

Resetting the cable modem due to docsDevResetNow

TCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=[redacted];CMTS-MAC=[redacted];CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;

The tech lead me to believe there would be an entire system upgrade happening in my area sometime in the next few months, which also implied the motivation to solve the issue in the area was probably low, since a lot of the equipment would be replaced, but this will cause issues for me professionally if I have to wait that long. 

Since the upstream signals seem to be high in general, but the logs show both exceeding top values of dynamic range, and commanded power in excess of 6dB below the top, what's going on here?

I'd gladly provide the full logs to any xfinity representatives for review. I just need this solved. I'll install anything needed to help smooth it out further, or bring things back to the middle ranges if needed. 

(edited)

Visitor

 • 

4 Messages

@AMD6347​ 

Replying to add to this: 

Within about 20 minutes of posting this, several aspects of my internet performance started going haywire. Due to router logs showing various attack warnings from comcast DHCP and DNS server addresses, I had started using cloudflare DNS servers, which worked perfectly for about 3 days, but suddenly I had to switch back to comcast DNS servers before I could get any internet connection at all to the devices on my network. Service continued to be slow, or intermittent, for about an hour or so, restarting the modem and router seemed to make no impact, it would cut out for several minutes, about every ten minutes. During that time, I was also not able to log into my modem to check logs and signal levels, no response from the IP address for the modem, which had worked perfectly to gather logs for the above post just shortly beforehand. 

This morning, I was able to get to the modem login again, but now almost all of yesterday's events are missing from the modem logs. It goes back to the end of June again, where yesterday it was completely full of events from yesterday only. 

Is it possible for comcast to clear logged events from the modem? Would posting this have caused them to start looking into the connection and cause service interruptions? I'm tracking router logs daily, including service disconnects, and noticed that most of the time I'm assigned a consistent IP address from comcast. Several times in the logs, and last night between this post and the service interruptions, that changed from a real ping-able public IP address to a private 192.168 type address assigned to me by comcast. That appears to have been only for a few minutes, but I can't make sense of why they would intermittently assign a private IP address. The timing is suspect, is this a testing mode of some kind? 

Now that I can get to the modem connection stats again, I see my upstream dB levels even higher than yesterday, from 46.8-49.8 across the 5 channels. 

Official Employee

 • 

1.8K Messages

Hey @AMD6347,

 

Thank you for visiting our official Xfinity Community Forums support page. We would be more than happy to look into your Xfinity Internet connection issues. 

 

Could you please send our team a direct message with your full name and full address? Our team can most definitely take a further look at this issue.

To send a "Peer to peer" ("Private") message:

Click ""Sign In" if necessary

• Click the "Peer to peer chat" icon

• Click the "New message" (pencil and paper) icon

• Type "Xfinity Support" in the ""To:" line and select "Xfinity Support" from the drop-down list which appears. The "Xfinity Support" graphic replaces the "To:" line

I am an Official Xfinity Employee.
Official Employees are from multiple teams within Xfinity: CARE, Product, Leadership.
We ask that you post publicly so people with similar questions may benefit from the conversation.
Was your question answered? Please, mark a reply as the Accepted Answer.tick

Visitor

 • 

4 Messages

@AMD6347​ 

Following up on my previous posts, for transparency in this process. 

After the response here in this post by an xfinity representative, I spent another hour on a chat with them, explaining the points I outlined in my posts here, until an appointment was setup. The chat agent stated they'd entered a reservation with a request for the previous tech to return, since I felt he understood the issue and was very knowledgeable.  I had hoped to discuss with him options of a return path attenuator to drop the upstream dB levels back to the middle of the range without impacting the downstream. I understood they didn't have control of who was dispatched, but they did what they could. 

Instead of that, they sent what appeared to be a sub-contracted 3rd party tech. Plain mini van with the magnetic logo, instead of the usual full size comcast fleet van. Nice guy, but dress and tool quality matched the van differences. His understanding of the issue was a barrier. I presented modem logs and videos of the modem lights when the channels drop, tried to explain, but as the issue is intermittent, he wasn't able to measure it, so told me everything was fine. 

I did manage to explain to a point where he did go outside to check the exterior junction box and as soon as he opened that, he expressed confusion about the splitter the previous tech installed to help adjust the dB levels on the last visit. I explained the reason that was added, but he disconnected that, and also disconnected the ground wire inside of that box, I'm not sure what the thought was on the ground wire. 

Since then, predictably, the upstream dB levels have returned to closer to the middle of the range, but that's been at the sacrifice of the downstream quality. My reported issue of dropping upstream channels was resolved, but it's created new issues due to the method. Several times in the couple days since they were here, I now see my download speeds drop to roughly 25% of the service plan download speed, and more like 20% of what I was actually previously getting. I'm still assessing the specifics of what's happening to report further, but this happens at a similar rate to the upstream issues. 

I received a chat message from xfinity support as follow up, and have shared the same details.  I've requested any form of escalation they might be able to offer to either the previous tech or any lead tech type positions to help find a more permanent solution. I'm currently awaiting a response. 

Visitor

 • 

4 Messages

@EG​ 

Thanks for the input. To clarify, what part was backwards? The return path portion, or adding the attenuator would make the dBs go up? 

Expert

 • 

110K Messages

2 years ago

An overall attenuator or a splitter would increase the upstream power. It works the opposite way for the downstream power. It decreases it.

The object would be to decrease the attenuation of the line thereby decreasing the upstream power. This is done by improving the line / hardware / connection quality. Removing any impairments.

forum icon

New to the Community?

Start Here