Hello, I have a new Motorola MB8600 modem. There are a large amount of uncorrected errors on every downstream channel, and I'm stuck wondering why. I understand that errors aren't too big of an issue, but uncorrected errors are and typically are a symptom of equipment failure somewhere within the system.
Most posts I've read have either been only a few channels having any errors, or they have some signal or power levels out of spec. I'm no expert, but from what I can tell - my power levels are all reasonable and signal strength seems to be good.
This was happening on my previous modem (SB8200) with the same connection issues and roughly identical uncorrected error counts over the same time period.
I have been facing this issue for quite a bit longer than I'd prefer, and have frequent packet loss, an unstable connection, as well as intermittent home internet outages.
I have tried replacing a few pieces of equipment on my end to remedy it without any success. I have replaced the coaxial cable from the wall to my modem, ethernet cables, as well as just purchased a new modem.
The connection channel information below is from the MB8600.
I am wondering if it could be xfinity's equipment, as I have no splitters or any odd connections between the modem and the line from the street.
Any and all help is appreciated greatly!
System Up Time |
0 days 00h:19m:43s |
Downstream Bonded Channels |
Channel |
Lock Status |
Modulation |
Channel ID |
Freq. (MHz) |
Pwr (dBmV) |
SNR (dB) |
Corrected |
Uncorrected |
1 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
29 |
651.0 |
1.0 |
41.1 |
7011 |
9402 |
2 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
2 |
489.0 |
3.8 |
42.6 |
11499 |
10256 |
3 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
3 |
495.0 |
3.1 |
32.3 |
14415 |
17329 |
4 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
4 |
501.0 |
2.1 |
39.1 |
35695 |
19079 |
5 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
5 |
507.0 |
2.1 |
42.1 |
9891 |
10965 |
6 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
6 |
513.0 |
1.7 |
41.9 |
15091 |
20396 |
7 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
7 |
519.0 |
0.8 |
41.4 |
36514 |
19390 |
8 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
8 |
525.0 |
0.5 |
41.5 |
10811 |
10150 |
9 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
9 |
531.0 |
0.9 |
41.5 |
11277 |
18666 |
10 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
10 |
537.0 |
-0.1 |
40.8 |
24473 |
16966 |
11 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
11 |
543.0 |
0.2 |
41.2 |
9126 |
8078 |
12 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
12 |
549.0 |
1.1 |
41.8 |
8132 |
13520 |
13 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
13 |
555.0 |
1.2 |
41.5 |
8159 |
10768 |
14 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
14 |
561.0 |
1.5 |
41.9 |
7787 |
6763 |
15 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
15 |
567.0 |
2.0 |
42.1 |
7736 |
6776 |
16 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
16 |
573.0 |
1.9 |
42.0 |
7587 |
5695 |
17 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
17 |
579.0 |
1.9 |
41.9 |
7379 |
8100 |
18 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
18 |
585.0 |
1.8 |
42.0 |
8082 |
7408 |
19 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
19 |
591.0 |
1.7 |
41.5 |
7642 |
5476 |
20 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
20 |
597.0 |
2.2 |
41.9 |
6831 |
9049 |
21 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
21 |
603.0 |
2.1 |
41.9 |
7352 |
8318 |
22 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
22 |
609.0 |
2.1 |
42.1 |
7288 |
5027 |
23 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
23 |
615.0 |
2.5 |
42.4 |
6365 |
7284 |
24 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
24 |
621.0 |
2.4 |
40.8 |
7340 |
6852 |
25 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
25 |
627.0 |
2.3 |
36.1 |
6311 |
7487 |
26 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
26 |
633.0 |
2.1 |
38.9 |
6932 |
7012 |
27 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
27 |
639.0 |
1.7 |
35.6 |
7102 |
4709 |
28 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
28 |
645.0 |
1.6 |
41.7 |
6386 |
10238 |
29 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
30 |
657.0 |
0.7 |
41.0 |
6899 |
5187 |
30 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
31 |
663.0 |
0.6 |
40.9 |
6201 |
11176 |
31 |
Locked |
QAM256 |
32 |
669.0 |
0.9 |
41.0 |
6681 |
10025 |
32 |
Locked |
OFDM PLC |
37 |
690.0 |
1.7 |
36.3 |
24932792 |
1962704 |
|
Upstream Bonded Channels |
Channel |
Lock Status |
Channel Type |
Channel ID |
Symb. Rate (Ksym/sec) |
Freq. (MHz) |
Pwr (dBmV) |
1 |
Locked |
SC-QAM |
1 |
2560 |
10.4 |
55.3 |
2 |
Locked |
SC-QAM |
2 |
5120 |
16.4 |
58.3 |
3 |
Locked |
SC-QAM |
3 |
5120 |
22.8 |
53.0 |
4 |
Locked |
SC-QAM |
4 |
5120 |
29.2 |
52.8 |
5 |
Locked |
SC-QAM |
5 |
5120 |
35.6 |
52.0 |
6 |
Locked |
SC-QAM |
6 |
1280 |
39.6 |
51.5 |
|
jfalko117
Visitor
•
3 Messages
3 years ago
Ok so I refreshed the connection status page to verify these signal levels this morning - they were still at the same magnitude as last night. I then noticed the upstream power levels being quite high, so I unplugged my modem and let it sit for about 5 minutes.
After plugging it back in, none of the the upstream power levels go beyond 50.0. I will give it until this evening to make sure that the uncorrected errors aren't piling up again, but so far this seems to be good.
0
0
EG
Expert
•
110.3K Messages
3 years ago
50 is marginal. 51 is too high / out of spec. They will go higher again. Especially in the peak heating of a Summer day.
In an effort to try to obtain better connectivity / more wiggle room, check to see if there are there any excess/unneeded coax cable splitters in the line leading to the modem that can be eliminated/re-configured. Any splitters that remain should be high quality and cable rated for 5-1000 MHz, bi-directional, and no gold colored garbage from Radio Shack, Home Depot, Target, etc. Splitters should be swapped with known to be good / new ones to test.
Also check the coax cable for any damage such as cuts, nicks, kinks, sharp bends, etc.
If there aren't any unneeded splitters that can be eliminated and if your coax wiring setup can't be reconfigured so that there is a single two-way splitter connected directly off of the drop from the street / pole with one port feeding the modem and the other port feeding the rest of the house/equipment with additional splits as needed and you've checked all the wiring and fittings for integrity and tightness and refresh them by taking them apart then check for and clean off any corrosion / oxidation on the center wire and put them back together again, then perhaps it's best to book a tech visit to investigate and correct.
Good luck with it !
(edited)
2
0
EG
Expert
•
110.3K Messages
3 years ago
@jfalko117 @XfinityElizabethA
Please circle back here and post any possible solutions for the issue here in the open forums so that all readers here may benefit from the exchange / info. This is in keeping with the spirit for which these public help forums were originally intended. Thank you.
0
0